Should I use
BULLSEYE or SYSTEM 96?
revised February 2005
It's a common question among beginners - major artists don't ask: they've been using Bullseye for years.
This question has also been the basis of a relentless comparative ad campaign that Spectrum Glass Co. (the parent of "System 96") has run since their recent entry into the fusing market.
Comparing an unproven product to the industry leader is a common marketing tactic.
Until recently the litany of reasons Spectrum gave for choosing System 96 included claims that "96 COE glasses have a Longer Working Range" which they promised would give the user "more control over surface dimension, more options in design [!] and a wider margin of error". After we had both glasses tested by an independent laboratory, disproved their claims, and sued for false advertising, they retracted the claims.
Since the lawsuit, Spectrum has reduced these claims largely to:
1) it's cheaper
2) the product line is a little weak, but they're "just getting started"
We're happy to start there.
Since the claim of CHEAPER is being championed by their new mascot, Mr. Yikes. Let's take a closer look at Mr. Yikes' Math.



